Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Veronica Merryfield wrote:
>> Just thinking about what I had wrote and remembered the semantics
>> used here...
>>
>>
>>> One more hint: card X is a very high end one. It should
>>> be 'perfect', or at least much better than card A.
>>>
>>
>> ... which might suggest that Card X is not performing well. Since it
>> has been stated the card x is not USB, it is possible that this card
>> has it's audio clock derived from the PC clock which is likely
>> dithered - they call it spread spectrum to help reduce radiated noise
>> in testing.
>>
>
> http://www.maxim-ic.com/app-notes/index.mvp/id/3503
>
> And how would this cause the issue?
Ok this would cause jitter because of the slew rate? But is there a
distance of (around or exactly) 100 Hz? Will the card itself split the
clock from 1000 Hz to 100 Hz? I guess the standard clock by RT kernels
will be 1000 Hz. Right?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat May 29 00:15:11 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 29 2010 - 00:15:11 EEST