Re: [LAD] Does noiseshaping affect quantisation noise?

From: Philipp Überbacher <hollunder@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jun 09 2010 - 17:31:28 EEST

Excerpts from fons's message of 2010-06-08 12:08:27 +0200:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:53:43AM +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
>
> > So the actual problem isn't the noise but its correlation with the signal?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I'm a bit curious about the first graph. The actual signal is the ~1kHz
> > one, but what are all the other 'spikes'?
>
> The quantisation error appearing as distortion. This the problem
> that is solved by using dithering.
>
> 1 kHz at FS = 48 kHz means a period of exactly 48 samples, the
> same values are repeated for each period. So the quantisation
> error is periodic as well, with a period of 1 kHz. In other
> words, distortion. Adding noise randomizes the quantisation
> error.
>
> Ciao,

I still don't understand why there's such a high amplitude spike each
2kHz. But don't worry, I will eventually :)

-- 
Regards,
Philipp
--
"Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jun 9 20:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 09 2010 - 20:15:02 EEST