On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>>> What is the purpose of 'http://' in that case ?
>>
>> They're just symbols.
>
> OK, let me rephrase the question: why are such ambiguous
> or misleading 'symbols' being used ?
It's up to the authors of those components. I agree, using
http:// should be discouraged unless it's a persisent URL.
I think the LV2 devs encourge these URI's to /be/ persistent
URL's... so they haven't opted to define a URI scheme (e.g.
lv2://). But I think having an LV2 URI scheme would be a
Good Thing.
Unfortunately, in XML namespaces (also URI's) this happens
often, too.
-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Jun 13 08:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jun 13 2010 - 08:15:02 EEST