Re: [LAD] Better lossless compressions?

On Tuesday 22 June 2010, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
>On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 22:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> And is there a snowballs chance in hell that this is un-encumbered?
>>
>> <http://electronicdesign.com/tabid/57/default.aspx?topic=algorithm_deliv
>>ers_lossless_compression_to_adc_samples&catpath=&fltrTitle=&fltrSummary=&
>>fltrPublication.aspx?nl=1>
>
>from TFA:
>: Implemented in a DSP chip or microprocessor, this simple compressor
>: requires about 50 instructions per sample. However, lossless
>: compression ratios fall between 1.3:1 and 2:1 on baseband signals.
>
>So a size of 75% expected and on occasion down to 50% after compression.
>How is that compared to existing implementations?
>
It was the lossless claim that got my attention, Jens. I am well aware that
current compressors can beat that at "acceptable" quality. But an ogg at q7
turned into an 192k mp3, or vice-versa, results in a blurred cacophony of
noise because each compressor throws away different stuff. The result is
still like fingernails on a backboard even to these 75 year old ears.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must be first
overcome.
		-- Dr. Johnson
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev