Re: [LAD] Better lossless compressions?

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:32 PM, <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 06:18:17PM -0300, A. C. Censi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:31 PM, <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > Does it decompress to the original ?
> >
> > ... lots of text but no answer ...
>
> So I'll repeat the question: Does it decompress to the original ?
> ( _it_ meaning the file that was reported to be compressed better
> than 7:1)
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
> E guerra e morte !
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>

No algorithm is provided to decompress, but I realize that I have made a
mistake, because I read in the audio as floating point, but the algorithm
uses integer based audio coding. So basically it thinks everything is 0,1,
or -1. I am using GNU Octave, and I have tried some different functions for
converting the audio to integers, but none of the functions provided by
octave seem to work. I'll try and do it properly some time.

Jeremy

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jun 23 04:15:04 2010