Re: [LAD] Feature request for FIL-Plugins

On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 22:53 +0200, fons@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 08:23:50PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > I guess a developer just needs to take a look at what is supported by
> > (in lexically order) Ardour, Qtractor and Rosegarden as host.
>
> Depends on the developer's own interests and target audience.
> For production tools I keep an eye on Ardour, and that's it
> more or less.
>
> If people think that Autotalent is really great then they
> should just use it. Even if its resampling code distorts as
> hell. If they believe that the Calf Compressor really has
> an RMS mode as it claims it has, let them be happy believing
> that. I don't care.
>
> Ciao,

That explains why you're happy with PCs to produce music, you don't use
MIDI ;). Anyway, some developer might care about at least the most
common hosts. Until now those are Ardour + Rosegarden and Qtractor gets
more and more fans too.

Now, autotalent might become better and might be important for the more
up to date pop music orientated crowed while people might use Calf
compressor without RMS mode.

I don't need autotalent. I do need a compressor, but if possible I avoid
using a compressor and try to do a good mix by using EQs instead of a
compressor.

Anyway, we do have different needs and I would welcome if you coders
take care of Ardour, Rosegarden and Qtractor. IMO anything else is less
important. Note, it's not unimportant!

0,02 €

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Jul 8 00:15:07 2010