On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:37:23PM +0100, Folderol wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:24:24 +0200
> fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
>
> > We all agree on what 'red' means. Because we have learned
> > the meaning of that word by association. But do we 'see'
> > the same thing ? AFAIK, that is impossible to verify.
>
> This brings back memories of long arguments amongst my friends (when
> we were all young and spotty).
>
> We thought we'd pinned it down when someone suggested that the only way
> to be sure, would be if humans developed telepathy - a whole 'nother
> arguing point :)
>
> That got shot down when someone suggested that the brain would have to
> do some form of translation to telepathic 'waves' and how could we be
> sure that everyone would translate the same way :)
Yes. This was pointed out by Wittgenstein some 0.75 centuries
ago - you can't prove consciousness.
Even if you torture someone and he's screaming like hell, you
can always say "it's a robot progranmed to act like this when
given the stimuli we are giving it", and there's no way to
disprove that.
Ciao,
-- FA There are three of them, and Alleline. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Fri Jul 23 04:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 23 2010 - 04:15:03 EEST