On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> The one the user choose for his desktop. Which is the only real way to
> compensate for visually impaired people (if thats the political correct name).
> I don't like this every-app-chooses-its-own-colors at all. Though I do
> understand that sometimes you need more colors, but that still is different
> from "I define my apps colors on my own because I think that is cool". The
> later results in apps with black text on dark-gray background in an otherwise
> very light desktop-environment => bad. Or in apps with white window background
> while the rest of the desktop is optimized for on-stage-in-the-dark with black
> background and red foreground => bad. Or it results with using two collors to
> "distinguish" which half visually impaired people can't discriminate => bad.
and which system color(s) do you propose to use to indicate:
* this thing is muted?
* this thing is rec-enabled?
* the value indicated here is at the low end of the scale?
* this object is blinking to alert you to some condition?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Sep 9 00:15:04 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 09 2010 - 00:15:04 EEST