On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 15:00:49 fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:16:07PM +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> > I need just
> >
> > Vout = Vin(a0 + a1*Vin + a2*Vin^2 + ... + aN*Vin^N)
> >
> > for given a0,..aN with limited N (a1..aN abs will be < 0.1). Say, we just
> > recalculat samples' amplitudes directly. Is there any caveats in such
> > direct transforming? And why do I need to use another (Chebyshev
> > polynomials) way?
>
> If that is what you need it's simple enough to compute...
Fons, I want just polinomial transformation regardless harmonics at all. I
have mentioned harmonics as a result of searching a LADSPA plugin related to
my needings.
I'm afraid direct amplitude caculation in accorance with a0...aN will produce
"too fast" signal deviation, resulting in exceeding fs/2 band.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Dec 1 16:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 01 2010 - 16:15:02 EET