Re: [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine

>
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:01:50 +0000
> From: Victor Lazzarini <Victor.Lazzarini@email-addr-hidden>
> Subject: Re: [LAD] Project proposition: llvm based dsp engine
> To: "linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden >> The Linux Audio
> Developers' Mailing List" <linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden>
> Message-ID: <EEFBDE7E-30EB-4C1D-87FF-39621F1EC4A8@email-addr-hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed";
> DelSp="yes"
>
> This is all very interesting. One question I had regarding the future
> development of FAUST is whether it will include some sort of scheduler
> so that various faust-coded objects can be instantiated at different
> times, connected together in series, etc.. Then an interpreter could
> be developed with JIT compilation etc.
>
> Or is this more like the idea of combining FAUST with another language
> like pure?
>
> Victor
> On 10 Dec 2010, at 12:28, St?phane Letz wrote:

I would say yes. Faust should stay as the DSP computation stage only.

Stéphane

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Dec 11 16:15:02 2010