On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:48 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 15, 2010 05:44:12 pm Dan Kegel did opine:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Dan Kegel <dank@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Harry Van Haaren
> <harryhaaren@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > >> Anybody know of a public email provider that is better? Or more so:
> > >> that can prove they are better?
> > >
> > > I'm afraid every webmail provider in the world is
> > > going to have the same basic problem: you shouldn't
> > > be trusting other people with your data.
> >
> > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/12/breaking-news-eff-victory-appeals-
> > court-holds is a ray of hope, though...
>
> Yes it is. Now, if we can just get a law that when I have pulled the msg
> to my machine, and issued the delete to the server, it truly was deleted,
> then they would need a search warrant to my machine in order to see
> yesterdays emails already pulled. The move has been to make the ISP's hold
> those supposedly deleted messages till the statutes run out, and TBT, there
> probably isn't an ISP on the planet with THAT much storage, not without
> treating it like an unfunded mandate. Which it sure is.
Good thought, 'rm' vs 'shred' ;), see 'man shred', but I'm sure they do
run 'rm' or any Windows equivalent.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Dec 16 04:15:09 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 16 2010 - 04:15:09 EET