On Friday, December 17, 2010 05:15:04 am Philipp Überbacher did opine:
[...]
> I guess it really depends on what you try to achieve. Afaik the average
> life-span of a HD is puny 2 years.
Some maybe. I have a 1Gb seacrate hawk I use on a TRS-80 Color Computer
that is a good 15 years old, and I hooked up an old Quantum P40S beside it
the other day that must be close to 18 years old. No bad sectors were
found when I did a logical verify of the surface.
> From what I heard the magnetic tapes
> used by for example ESA a long time ago have a life-span of 80 years. If
> 'store it good and forget' is what you're after then tape seems like a
> good idea.
That seems to be a recipe for disaster. Will there be a working tape drive
to read those old tapes in even 40 years? Here, I use 4 1Tb drives as
individual drives, 3 of which have individual installs on them, and the 4th
is for amanda, doing nightly backups of whatever install I am running this
year. With smartd running, I have been told far enough in advance of an
impending drive failure that my email corpus has not been lost since early
2002.
> As for my university, as far as I know they use some RAID system for
> everyday and tapes for sensitive data. And they already had their whole
> RAID fail at the same time.
So have I observed. Twice that I know of at my former, and occasionally
still, employers.
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Half the world is composed of people who have something to say and can't, and the other half who have nothing to say and keep on saying it. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Fri Dec 17 12:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Dec 17 2010 - 12:15:02 EET