Re: [LAD] Program design: C++ -> SHM -> Python

From: Harry Van Haaren <harryhaaren@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 26 2010 - 12:56:59 EET

Hi,

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> And once the shmem is working, you can try to port some of that
> to osc too.
>

Is it acceptable to be sending ±4 sec worth of float samples across OSC? It
sounds like quite a bit of data,
esp if the sampling rate goes upwards to 96... :-)

If that's possible I'll definatly be doing that, the reason I tried the
"same-binary" approach was I presume that
doing the OSC transfer of lots of data was a bad idea.. I have no reason to
like SHM, I've never used it and it
doesn't scale if I want to run on two different machines. Which was the
reason to control using OSC in the first place!

Summing up: Large data ( ±384,000 samples of float type ) OK to send with
OSC?

Thanks for the swift reply! -Harry

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Dec 26 16:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 26 2010 - 16:15:02 EET