On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Cherrett
<ccherrett@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Seems a bit more than a question, seems there is a few insinuations.
whatever insinuations are there are entirely your own imagination at
work. to repeat: i think (and said) that its (quite deeply) wrong to
take an existing FLOSS project, fork it, and not make it clear that
was the origin of a "new" project. however, reasonable people can
agree to disagree on whether that's really true, and it certainly
isn't against any licenses or anything like that. i was more just
puzzled why you chose to not refer to Muse when announcing OOM2, and
perhaps shaded my question too darkly.
as i said previously, i wish OOM2 well, and will look forward to
seeing what you guys come up with.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jan 28 00:15:08 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 28 2011 - 00:15:09 EET