Re: [LAD] RDF libraries, was Re: [ANN] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb

From: Stefano D'Angelo <zanga.mail@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Mar 01 2011 - 17:55:24 EET

2011/3/1 David Robillard <d@email-addr-hidden>:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 14:00 +0100, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>> 2011/3/1 David Robillard <d@email-addr-hidden>:
>> > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 17:24 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> [...]
>> >> Once you remove the glib dep, I should be able to tell you what size I get when
>> >> compiling with the Android NDK. I have checked again, and 100Kb is good in my
>> >> case. FYI, APK packaging uses zip compression.
>> >
>> > I would guess it will be at the very least a month before this happens,
>> > unless somebody steps up to do it. The relevant SLV2 release
>> > announcement will mention the glib removal.
>>
>> Are you planning to remove it in the next release?
>
> Nope. The next release will be very soon. It is not a short-term
> priority for me at all.
>
> If a solid replacement for all the necessary things shows up that I
> don't have to work on whatsoever, then I'll switch to it.
>
> I very much need to start releasing /plugins/ and /programs/ - things
> users actually /use/ directly. At first I only care about doing so on
> this platform, and glib is not a problem whatsoever on this platform.
> There's still a ton of LV2 core/extension work that needs doing before I
> get to do that. Pissing time away replacing glib? No thanks. :)

As said, same priority framework here, but your previous answer seemed
to indicate otherwise.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Mar 1 20:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 01 2011 - 20:15:02 EET