Re: [LAD] accepted use of sync callback

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Mar 26 2011 - 23:02:14 EET

On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, torbenh <torbenh@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:45:51PM +0100, Lieven Moors wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I'm not sure my program would satisfy the realtime constraint.
>> But I'll have a look at both options again...
>
> using the sync callback to detect a skip in the transport is
> not adequate usage of it.

i didn't interpret his question as meaning that, but yeah, OK.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Mar 27 00:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 27 2011 - 00:15:02 EET