On 17 April 2011 18:12, David Robillard <d@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 11:59 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
>> I like to disagree with David on most things LADSPA -- for example I
>> think a host that uses the "unique" ID at all is broken from the
>> outset
>
> Well, that's just silly... it's the only ID there is. What else would
> they use?
Library name plus label, for example. My hosts do that and have done
for years. Not ideal either of course, but at least it doesn't
completely stuff up any situation where a numerical ID can't be
generated in advance (dssi-vst, etc).
Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Apr 18 00:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 18 2011 - 00:15:02 EEST