I'm familiar with JACK but not at all with Pulse, but while doing a
little research to sum up various Linux audio APIs on a user group
list I keep seeing claims* that at first sight suggest Pulse is
capable of doing the audio routing with low latency that we know and
love JACK for doing.
Can someone sum up the differences between JACK and Pulse in this regard?
James.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_audio#Features
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Apr 23 16:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 23 2011 - 16:15:02 EEST