Re: [LAD] Feature requests: add JackSession support

From: michael noble <looplog@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jul 04 2011 - 06:10:24 EEST

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> 2011/7/3 Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden>:
>> Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>>
>>> ... none of the audio stuff i routinely do everyday would be possible
>>> without jack.
>>
>> Amen to that.
>
> I disagree with both of you. I think what you really mean is "none of
> this would be possible without some system for interconnecting
> processing elements together in flexible, creative,possibly
> unanticipated ways that also leaves the developers of those elements
> free to do things in their own way".
>
> that much i'd agree with. but this is not a description that requires
> that the solution be at the process level.

While technically I'm sure you're correct, I'd add a further caveat
that puts me on the side of Dave and Jörn. The specific and existing
applications and inter-application communication that JACK has
permitted is not easily replicable with any other given existing
modular system, and there are plenty of modular systems available from
PD to Max/MSP to audiomulch to bidule to Reason to ... you get the
point. Given that the solution that I enjoy using the most is JACK on
Linux with all of the process level folly that it entails, even though
it needn't have to be that way given the plethora of non-process level
alternatives, surely this must say something good about the system as
a whole (or admittedly, bad about me)?

-Michael
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jul 4 08:15:01 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 04 2011 - 08:15:01 EEST