Re: [LAD] a simple ring buffer, comments pls?

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jul 08 2011 - 23:41:54 EEST

On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> - You can use all 2^n elements, there is no ambiguity between
> full and empty.

so what does it mean when wr_index == rd_index?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Jul 9 00:15:04 2011

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Davis: "Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?"
Previous message: Fons Adriaensen: "Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?"
In reply to: Fons Adriaensen: "Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?"
Next in thread: Arnold Krille: "Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?"
Reply: Arnold Krille: "Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?"
Reply: Fons Adriaensen: "Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 09 2011 - 00:15:04 EEST

Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?

Re: [LAD] a simple ring buffer, comments pls?