Re: [LAD] a *simple* ring buffer, comments pls?

On Tuesday 12 July 2011 22:20:48 Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 09:45 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > Thinking it over and going back over some references and earlier
> > threads here (e.g. much earlier ones from Olivier et al) it does seem
> > that this should be enough. This particular situation isn't so
> > complicated after all. I think the more I read earlier during this
> > thread (and reading around) generally about memory ordering, the more
> > I was beginning to feel as if the entire subject was a source of only
> > trouble.
>
> Quite interestingly, I have noticed that discussions about memory barriers
> are often somehow endless.

You mean there should be a barrier to discussions about memory barriers?

Sorry, couldn't resist...

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev