Re: [LAD] Fwd: Fwd: lv2 extension bugs

Hello David,

On 07/27/2011 01:44 AM, David Robillard wrote:

> For the sake of the record, serd, sord, and lilv are not LV2 extensions
> and are not found at http://lv2plug.in. Serd and sord are minimal RDF
> syntax/store libraries (respectively), and not LV2 specific (though
> deliberately suitable for implementing LV2). Lilv is an LV2 host
> library that uses serd and sord. Serd, sord, and Lilv can be found at
> http://drobilla.net

I understand that you want LV2 to be a standard and only a standard, and thus
only show its specification on http://lv2plug.in. You seem to consider that
serd, sord and lilv are helper libraries and only one route amongst other
possible routes to host LV2 plugins. This is consistent in /principle/, but do
you not something feel like such "modularity" can be confusing, when compared to
existing major plugin technologies which provide everything as an SDK? Do you
not feel like a complete LV2 SDK would be more developer friendly, in /practice/?

Regards,

--
  Olivier
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev