Hello Gabriel,
On 07/29/2011 04:32 PM, Gabriel Beddingfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Olivier Guilyardi <list@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> possible routes to host LV2 plugins. This is consistent in /principle/, but do
>> you not something feel like such "modularity" can be confusing, when compared to
>> existing major plugin technologies which provide everything as an SDK? Do you
>> not feel like a complete LV2 SDK would be more developer friendly, in /practice/?
>
> Sure, this would be a Good Thing. It just needs someone to
> propose/implement it. Olivier? :-)
1. I don't have time to work on this. 2. That's a task for the core LV2 devs IMO
and I'm not part of the LV2 team. 3. If I became part of the team, I wouldn't
see things from the outside anymore, which is useful to give practical ideas.
I have spent some time trying to get a global figure of plugins in general, and
this SDK question comes from this point of view. An external point of view.
-- Olivier _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Fri Jul 29 20:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 29 2011 - 20:15:02 EEST