On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 20:07 -0800, Iain Duncan wrote:
> Thanks everyone for all the help on my architecture questions. It
> seems like a lot of the best practise functionality has
> tools/components for it already in Jack. I *was* planning on using
> rtaudio in order to be cross platform, but if it's a lot easier to get
> things done in Jack, i could live with being limited to linux and OS
> X.
>
Jack MIDI should (at least in theory) be portable to any platform where
Jack runs.
>
> Just wondered if I could poll opinions, for a real time step sequencer
> meant to do super tight timing and by syncable with other apps, is
> Jack going to be a lot easier to work with? Should I just lay into the
> jack tutorials?
Definitely yes. Dramatically easier, and (AFAIK) the *only* API that
will give you jitter-free sample accurate MIDI between applications.
-dr
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Nov 14 08:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 14 2011 - 08:15:03 EET