Re: [LAD] RAUL or other libraries for real this time? ;-)

From: Tim Blechmann <tim@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Nov 17 2011 - 21:48:29 EET

> Thanks Tim, I'll def check it out. What's the difference to a newbie like
> myself between yours and the one in Jack?
>
> Congrats btw, that's awesome that your work will be in boost!

the main difference is prbly that the jack ringbuffer is plain c and prbly
needs libjack, while boost.lockfree is a c++ library and header-only.

cheers, tim

> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Tim Blechmann <tim@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > > part I need library help with is likely synchronization and
> > > interprocess/interthread communication. ( ie do I use the jack
> >
> > ringbuffer?
> >
> > > Do I look at boost queue implementations? does RAUL have a higher
> > > level
> > > convenience ring buffer?
> >
> > my boost.lockfree library has been accepted and will be shipped with
> > future boost releases. it contains an mpmc-stack, an mpmc-queue and a
> > wait-free spsc
> > ringbuffer (same algorithm as the jack/kernel/supercollider ringbuffer).
> >
> > git repo: http://tim.klingt.org/git?p=boost_lockfree.git;a=summary
> > (note that the addressing_reviews branch will be the one that will go
> > into boost)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Nov 18 00:15:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 18 2011 - 00:15:02 EET