Re: [LAD] easiest way to serialize messages for sending over a ringbuffer?

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Dec 14 2011 - 23:54:56 EET

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Can you send a pointer to your struct over the ringbuffer instead?

only if you establish very clear rules about buffer ownership. that
can be tricky to do.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Dec 15 00:15:03 2011

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Coccoli: "Re: [LAD] easiest way to serialize messages for sending over a ringbuffer?"
Previous message: Paul Coccoli: "Re: [LAD] easiest way to serialize messages for sending over a ringbuffer?"
In reply to: Paul Coccoli: "Re: [LAD] easiest way to serialize messages for sending over a ringbuffer?"
Next in thread: Paul Coccoli: "Re: [LAD] easiest way to serialize messages for sending over a ringbuffer?"
Reply: Paul Coccoli: "Re: [LAD] easiest way to serialize messages for sending over a ringbuffer?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 15 2011 - 00:15:03 EET