Re: [LAD] Denormals / subnormals (again)

From: Gabriel M. Beddingfield <gabrbedd@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jan 03 2012 - 05:23:11 EET

On 01/02/2012 07:22 PM, Carl Hetherington wrote:
> If you compile your code (e.g. a plugin) without -msse and -mfpmath=sse
> on the GCC command line you get *no* protection from denormals from the
> CPU. If they occur in your code, they will be very much slower than

-ffast-math doesn't work?

> If you compile your code with -msse and -mfpmath=sse, you have Ardour's
> protection from denormals. If the user's CPU supports it, you get there
> is no significant slowdown with denormals using this mode. However CPU
> support is "some later processors with SSE2", according to Intel.

Doesn't that translate to something like: Pentium 4, Pentium M, or Later.

-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jan 3 08:15:01 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 03 2012 - 08:15:01 EET