On January 6, 2012 1:32:36 PM Dave Stikkolorum wrote:
> On 06-01-12 13:22, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Dave Stikkolorum<davers@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >> Not the communication, but I think Hydrogen over jack has more delay
> >> then directly,
> >> but I don't know this for sure.
> >
> > the use of JACK adds no delay.
> >
> >> Also jack causes other , not jack programs like audio plugins for
> >> browser, to hang/stop.
> >
> > http://jackaudio.org/faq
> >
> >> Why is jack / or an other audio layer not completely integrated like
> >> in
> >> windows and mac os,
> >
> > its not completely integrated on either of those platform. if you want
> > to route audio between applications on windows or OS X, guess what
> > your likely first choice technology is going to be?
>
> Ok, maybe that's true. But the use is in the basic situations more
> simple I think.
> don't get me wrong. I am a linux fan anyway ;)
>
> > also, because this is linux. there is nobody around to force such
> > things.
>
> Ok, that's true.
> Sometimes I get very frustrated to start all these applications seperatly.
> Also lash seems to be dead(according to it's creator).
LADISH has stepped in as a emulating replacement for LASH.
By now it may be fully functional.
Nedko, is it working yet?
Tim.
> And I don't think Jack sessions is going to be adopted by al these programs.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Jan 7 00:15:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 07 2012 - 00:15:01 EET