On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Sebastian Moors wrote:
>> But yes, kit customization is in the pipeline, although behind getting the
>> core solid and stable.
>
> Hm, i'm sceptic about this point... This code duplication seems to be quite
> an overhead. If you go into every detail of drumkit management, you end up
> with re-writing a lot of hydrogen classes in plain C. Is that really worth
> the effort?
>
> Why not improve the drumkit editing abilities of hydrogen? Or create a
> dedicated drumkit editor on top of hydrogen's codebase (imho, hydrogen is
> not really user-friendly enough when it comes to kit-creation...) ?
Or make a libhydrogen with a plain C public API? :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Feb 14 20:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 14 2012 - 20:15:02 EET