Re: [LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs

Hey Dave,

I've been working with juce plugins a lot recently, and one of my projects
handles precisely that:
http://distrho.sourceforge.net/

juce has not been very linux-friendly in it's early days, and still has a
few issues right now (but it's now much better than before).
I plan to move all plugins from the old jucetice project to DISTRHO (which
most is already done, only missing Jost).
these changes are not yet ready though, as I'm updating all the plugins to
the very latest juce-git modules branch, and also working on a serious
juce-linux issue with realtime kernels.
once everything is done, I'll post to the linuxaudio planet as usual
(through KXStudio news)

if you're using plugins from here:
http://www.anticore.org/jucetice/
or
http://code.google.com/p/juced/

you'll have issues for sure. Old loomer plugins had issues too, but the new
ones seem to work fine now.

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hiddenwrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I notice that whenever I use any Juce-based native Linux VST plugin - fx
> or instrument - in Ardour3 the plugin produces dramatically more xruns than
> any LV2 or LADSPA plug. Does anyone else have that problem ? If so, can
> anything be done about it, apart from raising my latency settings ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> dp
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden.**linuxaudio.org<Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden>
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/**listinfo/linux-audio-dev<http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Feb 21 16:15:01 2012