Re: [LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs

You can take the latest git by using:
git clone git://distrho.git.sf.net/gitroot/distrho/distrho --depth 1

but I don't but I recommend it right now. The current build system
(premake) uses static build flags, and would require a lot of manual
editing to set it differently.
one of my targets once I get everything working with the latest juce-git is
to port the build system to cmake. when that happens it will be much easier
to compile the plugins.
(juce itself is not needed, it pre-included in the repo - and has custom
patches)

Did you also tested the loomer plugins? how do they behave compared to the
disthro ports?

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hiddenwrote:

> On 02/21/2012 07:46 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:
>
> Hey Dave,
>
> I've been working with juce plugins a lot recently, and one of my projects
> handles precisely that:
> http://distrho.sourceforge.net/
>
> juce has not been very linux-friendly in it's early days, and still has a
> few issues right now (but it's now much better than before).
> I plan to move all plugins from the old jucetice project to DISTRHO (which
> most is already done, only missing Jost).
> these changes are not yet ready though, as I'm updating all the plugins to
> the very latest juce-git modules branch, and also working on a serious
> juce-linux issue with realtime kernels.
> once everything is done, I'll post to the linuxaudio planet as usual
> (through KXStudio news)
>
> if you're using plugins from here:
> http://www.anticore.org/jucetice/
> or
> http://code.google.com/p/juced/
>
> you'll have issues for sure. Old loomer plugins had issues too, but the
> new ones seem to work fine now.
>
>
> Hi Filipe,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Alas, some of the problematic plugins I tested were
> from the DISTRHO collection (specifically the TAL reverbs 2 and 3 and the
> TAL vocoder. I tested the prebuilt binaries, btw. Perhaps a local build
> would be preferable ? I have the latest JUCE framework and the VST 2.4 SDK,
> on an Arch 64-bit system.
>
> Also, I wanted to add a "Thank you" for those ports and I hope you're
> inspired to make more of them. :)
>
> Best,
>
> dp
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I notice that whenever I use any Juce-based native Linux VST plugin - fx
>> or instrument - in Ardour3 the plugin produces dramatically more xruns than
>> any LV2 or LADSPA plug. Does anyone else have that problem ? If so, can
>> anything be done about it, apart from raising my latency settings ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> dp
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
>> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing listLinux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Feb 21 16:15:02 2012