Re: [LAD] memory allocation for the real time thread, opinions wanted

From: Harry van Haaren <harryhaaren@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Feb 28 2012 - 16:16:20 EET

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Paul Coccoli <pcoccoli@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Why not just use 2 ringbuffers: one to send pointers to the RT thread,
> and a second to send them back to the low prio thread (so it can free
> them)
>
The entire Luppp engine is based around that principle. The only downside
is that one can't prioritze the messages, they must all be handled every
process() to ensure that nothing essential is missed.. But that's something
small I can live with :)

-Harry

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Feb 28 16:15:04 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 28 2012 - 16:15:04 EET