On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> What would be an interesting addition to Jack would be the possibility
> to reduce the timing uncertainty for certain clients. At the moment
> a client can run anywhere between the start of a cycle and the start
> of the next one - no assumptions can be made. If a2j would always
> run near the start of a cycle, and j2a never before e.g. 90% of the
> cycle has passed, that would enable to reduce the minimum required
> latency.
re: the j2a part ... given that the server may be otherwise done with
the period after less than 5% of the period time has elapsed, this
seems hard to guarantee and counter-productive (it would require a
double wakeup of the server).
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Mar 19 16:15:03 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 19 2012 - 16:15:03 EET