On 03/22/2012 04:10 PM, David Robillard wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 11:55 +0100, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder what the LAD community thinks about Non Session Manager
>>
>> http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm/API.html
>> http://non.tuxfamily.org/nsm
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ui-gC_ZMeGM
>> http://youtu.be/xzspJXbEoc0
>>
>> From a user POV I must say that it works very smooth at first sight.
>
> I haven't actually tried it yet, but took a peek.
>
> From the developer POV, the implementation of the daemon about 2000
> lines of C or so, and it only depends on a standard protocol (OSC) with
> several implementations.
>
> I have no idea how well it works, or what I think of the details, but
> that wins it major points in my book. It is an appropriate size for the
> task at hand and doesn't ram dependencies down implementer's throats.
>
> -dr
>
>
Thanks David. More devs with an opinion? Fons, Torben, Paul, Emanual, ... ?
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Mar 24 16:15:03 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 24 2012 - 16:15:04 EET