Re: [LAD] changes in gcc

technically the first order (the one that fails) was always wrong.

its unfortunate that at least a generation or two of developers got
used to the fact that it was permitted.

On 4/29/12, Emanuel Rumpf <xbran@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Now ... isn't this a bit frustrating, if scripts stop to work after
> only 5 years ??
>
> I tried to compile ladspa-sdk, which failed.
> As I found out, it is due to (nowadays) invalid argument order:
>
> failed:
> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LIBRARIES) -o ../bin/listplugins listplugins.o
>
> works:
> $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o ../bin/listplugins listplugins.o $(LIBRARIES)
>
> gcc 4.6.3
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Apr 29 16:15:02 2012