Re: [LAD] LV2 Achievement of GMPI Requirements

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:13 AM, David Robillard <d@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> I have adapted the GMPI requirements final draft document to a
> comparison with the current state of LV2: http://lv2plug.in/gmpi.html

Excuse my curiosity, but whose government's permit to dig on the site
of GMPI did you have to obtain through bribing? :)

> It may also be useful to augment this document with additional
> requirements, particularly since there's several knowledgeable folks who
> may not grok the *how* of LV2 but know *what* they need in terms of
> general requirements. I will add a section for this if anybody has any
> input.
>
> Perhaps this will serve as a good road map that is not too bogged down
> with details.

I'm a bit concerned about your stance towards portability of LV2.

Audacity used to have that problem with regards to an existing
implementation of LV2, and they had to disable the code completely,
along with (quite useful, IMHO) automatic classification of plug-ins
in menu (there was another reason for the latter, though). So I'm
curious if an extra layer is really that much required.

Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Aug 1 00:15:03 2012