On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, David Robillard <d@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> Is there a reason Jack can't do this for everything? I am not really
> keen on putting a bunch of mysterious assembler crap in a host meant to
> be a relatively clean example, and it's even worse to make plugins have
> to do this...
>
JACK doesn't get a chance to handle the output of a plugin until the host
hands it over to JACK and the process cycle ends. Just have a reverb plugin
outputting denormals and then have the host apply a gain value and boom ..
JACK can't play a role in that signal flow.
> What is the scope of the state of the flush-to-zero flag? Process?
> Thread?
>
process, i believe.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 2 20:15:04 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 02 2012 - 20:15:04 EEST