Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

From: Adrian Knoth <adi@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Oct 17 2012 - 18:58:33 EEST

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:07:20PM +0200, Uwaysi Bin Kareem wrote:

> http://paradoxuncreated.com/Blog/wordpress/?p=2268

The site mentions:

--- quote ---
> sudo schedtool -p 98 -n -20 -F `pgrep X`
--- end quote ---

Setting the X-server to FIFO/98 is just plain wrong, at least on an
audio mailing list.

And then:

--- quotes ---
> To go with this I also recommend, using the Ubuntu 2d desktop, as it has
> low-jitter. Also the chromium-browser has low-jitter (better youtube).
--- end quotes ---

I have no idea what you're trying to prove here, but I'm pretty sure you
have a general misunderstanding of jitter, thread wake-up latencies and
proper scheduling priorities.

-- 
mail: adi@email-addr-hidden  	http://adi.thur.de	PGP/GPG: key via keyserver
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Oct 17 20:15:01 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 17 2012 - 20:15:02 EEST