On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:16:57AM +0530, Prasant J wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Egor Sanin <egor.sanin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Assuming it's underpowered and headless, you can take a look at ecasound:
> > http://ecasound.seul.org/ecasound/
> >
> > Clean API and lot's of language bindings to interact with it.
> >
> > But you should first look at Nama, because it may be exactly what you
> > intend to develop:
> > http://freeshell.de/~bolangi/cgi1/nama.cgi/00home.html
>
>
> @Egor: bang on! I will read more about ecasound & nama. Thanks a lot
> for pointing out that to me.
> Can I assume that both are popular, stable & actively developed?
Ecasound is popular, mature, robust, versatile, low level.
Nama adds typical DAW abstractions
(projects/tracks/buses/inserts), some algorithms for
generating Ecasound signal processing networks, and its own
command language. The core features are stable fairly
well exercised. Nama deals with .WAV files, so you
would handle mp3 conversion in a separate step.
Hope this helps.
Joel
> -Prasant
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
-- Joel Roth _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Thu Nov 22 12:15:03 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 22 2012 - 12:15:03 EET