Re: [LAD] Announcing PHASEX-0.14.96

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jörn Nettingsmeier
>
> On 12/30/2012 05:42 AM, William Weston wrote:
> > Happy New Year!
> >
> > Yes, your eyes are working correctly. This is v0.14.96. Some things
> > are worth the wait. I know it's been a while, but I haven't forgotton
> > about PHASEX...
>
> whoohooo!
>
>
> just a quick feedback: distros that are moving to a unified /usr/bin
> will need this patch:
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 5fb0368..3b2496c 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -334,7 +334,8 @@ AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(PHASEX_GCC_MINOR, [$gccminor],
> [Built with gcc minor version]
>  CPU_POWER_LEVEL=2
>  ARCH_OPT_CFLAGS=""
>  ARCH_MATH_CFLAGS=""
> -ARCH_BITS=`( file /bin/true | grep 'ELF 64-bit' > /dev/null && echo 64
> ) || echo 32`
> +ARCH_TRUE=`which true`
> +ARCH_BITS=`( file $ARCH_TRUE | grep 'ELF 64-bit' > /dev/null && echo 64
> ) || echo 32`
>
> because `file /bin/true` will return "/bin/true: symbolic link to
> `/usr/bin/true'", which in turn will force the bitness to 32, which then
> fails unless a full 32-bit environment is installed.

Thank you.  This is now in the dev tree.

> now i'm hunting a couple errors wrt jack headers - my guess is that
> PHASEX is being tested with JACK2 exclusively - it seems to rely on a
> couple of types and methods which don't seem to be present in my jack1
> environment (more or less fresh from svn).

You're absolutely right.  I actually haven't tested with jack1 since
adding JACK Session support.  I'll have to check and see what else is
jack2 only.  Restoring jack1 support will be top priority for v0.14.97.

Thanks again,

--ww
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Dec 30 12:15:02 2012