Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems

On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 23:44 +0100, Alex Stone wrote:
[...]
> As a user of NSM, and from that user perspective, it does what it says
> on the tin. It's user friendly, and helps administer the process of
> starting up my large sessions with no rocket science involved.
>
> Given the strong wills, and previous scorch marks in the ML about
> session management, i have no desire to light a match here, but for
> the simple task of starting a succession of apps in a session, NSM
> does its job well, imho.
>
> How much code is required in apps to enable them for NSM use?
>
> Is there an appetite for at least one session management app that does
> the simple stuff well that users can become familiar with as a
> "linuxaudio" basic default, as a "unified" community protocol
> agreement, without descending into hades and a flame war, in the
> interest of taking the community forward, and giving users a better
> experience?

Oh boy, *this*, again.

In retrospect, replying to this thread at all is surely the dumbest
thing I will do today. Nevermind.

Have a nice day ;)

-dr (Who still thinks a universally restorable format is a nice idea)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev