Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems

From: hermann meyer <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Sun Feb 24 2013 - 07:13:41 EET

Am 24.02.2013 06:02, schrieb J. Liles:
>
> I stated it out already in a other thread: without ever been
> released as NSM (means available as tarball, or what ever, with
> ONLY NSM included), I wouldn't support it.
>
>
> This is stupid. What difference does it make what other programs are
> in the source repository? Distributions can and should package the
> programs individually. Also, NSM clients require from the NSM server
> implementation. There is no libnsm to link to etc. This is the
> definition of a non-issue.

So be it for you.
For me, a session management which I will support in my projects, have
to be released as such. Otherwise I wouldn't waste my time with it. period.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Feb 24 08:15:02 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 24 2013 - 08:15:03 EET