On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Fons Adriaensen]
> >Exactly the same with the form I proposed, w, a, b need to be computed
> >just once, not for every gain change. In fact only w depends on the
> >sample rate, a and b are fixed constants.
>
> Ah yes, sorry, I see that now.
>
> If that extra operation comes around to bite hard enough, I'll be sure
> to chain two 1st-order lowpass filters.
There is a much more important (in some use cases) feature of
this form: you can change 'w' (cutoff frequency c.q. settling
time) instantly without introducing transients into the signal.
Doing this with a biquad would generate a step in the output.
So it's the ideal form for a 'voltage controlled' filter.
In fact the famous 'Moog ladder' is just the same but using
four first order sections instead of two.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Wed Mar 20 00:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 20 2013 - 00:15:02 EET