Re: [LAD] build troubles with gtklick

On Mon, April 8, 2013 8:38 pm, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> dominic, ralf, thanks for this hint, however...
>
> On 04/08/2013 02:39 AM, Dominique Michel wrote:
>> Le Mon, 08 Apr 2013 01:16:37 +0200,
>> Jörn Nettingsmeier <nettings@email-addr-hidden> a écrit :
>>>
>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gtklick/klick_backend.py",
>>> line 12, in <module>
>>> import liblo
>>> ImportError: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/liblo.so: undefined
>>> symbol: lo_address_new_with_proto
>>>
>>> i have tried both liblo-0.26 and current liblo svn, no luck.
>>>
>>> now the python paths in this openSUSE tumbleweed install are a
>>> horrible mess, with three different python versions and libs
>>> in /usr/lib, /usr/lib64, and /usr/local/lib64. but they all seem to
>>> be found, and i made sure that the liblo.so mentioned in the error
>>> message is actually the one from your pyliblo package (by copying it
>>> manually). i removed the build directory of pyliblo for each try, and
>>> also recreated liblo.c via cython.
>>>
>>> how do i proceed to fix this?
>>
>> python is a mess in itself because we have python 2 and 3, and the
>> shebang of many python programs is set as #!/usr/bin/python, which
>> doesn't tell the system which version to use.
>> You have to adjust the shebangs so that the scripts will use the
>> correct version. Something like
>>
>> #!/usr/bin/python2.7
>
> i've tried both python2 and python2.7 in the hashbang. but the error
> remains the same. to me it looks like a pyliblo/liblo version
> mismismatch, but i'm not sure....
>

Why not run it in virtualenv and bypass the suse packaging library system?

--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev