[Fons Adriaensen]
>I've learned to mute monitoring while doing such tests...
I was suspecting you had :)
>> It adds to the evidence that implementing thorough control
>> smoothening is inevitable in the long run.
>
>That may or not solve the problem. You have 3 input parameters
>(P), and 5 biquad coefficients (C). Interpolating the C can
>make a biquad unstable, and if this happens it doesn't matter
>how fast or slow you do it. The only solution is to interpolate
>the C only between sets of values that correspond to values of
>the P that are not too far apart. So you need two levels, first
>on the P to limit the rate of change of the parameters, then on
>the C to avoid zipper noise.
I'm planning to evade this problem by crossfading between two parallel
static filters. Some phase mismatch issues can probably be expected
when the parameter sweep covers a larger range, but I'm hopeful it
will turn out not to be much of a problem in actual practice, and that
we will find out soon. It really needs a fix.
Tim
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Aug 25 12:15:07 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 25 2013 - 12:15:08 EEST