On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:01:42PM +0200, R. Mattes wrote:
> Yes, and why shouldn't it? I read it as a marker to show which
> files have been changed.
There is world of difference (also legally) between
"Copyright (c) xxxxxx'
and
"Additional code/modifications by xxxxx"
> Well, I would take it as a _marker_
Like a dog pissing on a lamppost, or some juvenile spraying
his tags on someone else's property ?
> And of course, for every update of
> Aeolus I have to hand-patch my local changes into uptream insteda of
> a simple 'git merge' (or the hg/svn equivalent).
Of course. If you don't bother to let me known what changes
you require, even if they may be of interest to others, why
should I care ?
> Au contraire - FOSS is all about sharing.
That is one aspect of it, and one that by definition should
go both ways.
> Sometimes the tone on the mailing list (and comments about the
> required quality of coding) make such enquiries seem daunting ... ;-)
And that is entirely intentional. What do you expect ? Try
and go to your whatever - baker, sports team, bar keeper...
and tell them you can instantly improve what they do. Maybe
they'll listen. But chances are 99.9% that they will tell you
to learn your trade first and then come back.
Ciao,
-- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Fri Sep 20 08:15:04 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 20 2013 - 08:15:04 EEST