Re: [LAD] Aeolus

From: hermann meyer <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Fri Sep 20 2013 - 16:15:04 EEST

Am 20.09.2013 15:07, schrieb hermann meyer:
> Am 20.09.2013 11:00, schrieb michel dominique:
>> On jeu. 19/09/13 17:50 , IOhannes m zmoelnig<zmoelnig@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> >Hash: SHA1
>>> >
>>> >On 2013-09-19 05:31, hermann meyer wrote:
>>>>> > >>
>>>> > >I'm sad to hear that.:-( Please don't let you lead from the things
>>>> > >you didn't like, let you lead from the things you like instead. I
>>>> > >guess then it's necessary to let you know that we use/as well/ a
>>>> > >fork of your work, the zita-convolver library, in the guitarix
>>>> > >project. But we leave your copyright untouched, and the fork will
>>>> > >only come in use, when the user set a explicit compile flag. We
>>>> > >didn't promote it, or force the fork. Ordinary your original code
>>>> > >is in use. We do it to use ffmpeg instead fftw3 FFT, which perform
>>>> > >better on ARM devices.
>>> >
>>> >but this sounds like the perfect opportunity to not do a simple fork,
>>> >but to send patches to upstream so fons' aeolus could support both
>>> >fftw3 and ffmpeg FFTs.
>>> >it might be a win-win situation, where not only more than just the
>>> >original aeolus users can profit from fons' work (because you use his
>>> >code) but also more than just your users can profit from your work
>>> >(because you changes are included into upstream aeolus).
>> I fully agree. As the main fvwm-crystal developer, I know how hard it can
>> be to get good users returns. I find it scary if even developers cannot
>> share with each others.
> Oh, we have announced this on the list(s) here some time ago:
> Am 18.07.2013 23:29, schrieb Andreas Degert:
>> The Guitarix developers proudly present
>>
>> Guitarix release 0.28.0 "magic chainsaw trick" *)
>>
>> [ . . .]
>> List of changes:
>>
>> [ . . ]
>> * Optimizations for embedded systems / ARM processors with NEON
>> * --faust-vectorize-float, --convolver-ffmpeg
>> [ . . . ]
> without a single (list) reply, which imply us a low interest in this here.
>
And more over we didn't announce any release here anymore. Because if
communication becomes a one way route, it becomes meaningless.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Sep 21 00:15:15 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 21 2013 - 00:15:16 EEST