Re: [LAD] [LAU] limiting email traffic

From: hermann meyer <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Thu Oct 31 2013 - 19:28:32 EET

Am 31.10.2013 17:51, schrieb Robin Gareus:
> On 10/31/2013 05:32 PM, Fred Gleason wrote:
> [..]
>> Might we want to consider modifying this rule so as to apply to a
>> dozen messages *in a given thread* per day? I agree that, if one is
>> doing that much shouting about a single topic, it'd probably be
>> better to give it a rest. :)
> That was the initial intention. However it's much harder to do. The
> current implementation is a few lines of bash. it does not look at the
> content at all, just address and mail-headers as logged by the MTA.
> Basically inotifywait mail.log; cut, sort, uniq, wc, test
>
> You're welcome to provide a tool to do a better job. It's probably not
> too hard in perl or python, but I did not consider it worth my time.
>
> Before you get down to implement it however, consider volunteering as
> list-moderator. I hazard a guess that it is effectively more efficient
> to do things manually when it comes to more complex rules.
>
> If interested please contact linux-audio-user-owner@email-addr-hidden
> (which is not me).
>
> robin
> _______________________________________________

Often such threads change the title because they drift into more or less
of-topic.
I must say I like the "limit" given peer user and day.
My mail box have a limit for 300 mails at all, from time to time it get
flouted by mails from such threads, and I can't receive more mails then,
before I have delete the mass from the server.
That could be a pity, when I'm travel (and I travel a lot).

regards
hermann

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Oct 31 20:15:03 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 31 2013 - 20:15:04 EET