Re: [LAD] JACK latency API clarifications

From: Lieven Moors <lievenmoors@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Feb 21 2014 - 20:52:21 EET

> it was part of the API very early on, then we decided we didn't want to
> impose the possibility of change on clients. as time goes on, it becomes
> clear (to me at least) that we should have implemented it.

What would be use cases for changing the sample rate dynamically?

lieven

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Feb 22 00:15:01 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 22 2014 - 00:15:02 EET