On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:46:17AM -0700, Len Ovens wrote:
> The only downside is longer sysex events. I think there is work
> underway to deal with this as well, but of course a long sysex no
> longer would have sample acurate timing (maybe the first part will
> be time stamped) or at least would have added latency (ie. it would
> no longer be real time anyway). But that is a problem rawmidi would
> have to deal with as well. I do not know if there is a particular
> byte count limit to sysex events or if it varies with jack latency
> (the length of the cycle). But if you expect users to use this live,
> then it needs to work with reasonably low latency.
I can't help but think that if you're doing something that requires sample-accurate sysex messages, you're doing something a bit strange and wrong :-D
-- Gordonjcp MM0YEQ _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sat Apr 4 00:15:02 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 04 2015 - 00:15:02 EEST